War Coverage
Monday, March 24th, 2003Okay, so I’m against war in general and this war specifically, but I have to admit that David Bloom has got to have one of the coolest jobs ever. Ever. By far, he is one of the best embedded journalists yet.
And for the record, I’m not crazy about Peter Arnett, though he’s got some brass ones to be able to report from The Hotel Baghdad (note: probably not its real name) without going stark raving mad from all the explosions. That’s gotta keep you at night. Wonder what the room service is like.
The part that bothers me (okay, there are several, but here’s just one for you) is that the coverage is a little too play-by-play sports-coverage-ified, if you know what I mean. Getting a little too close to entertainment to be news. Does that scare you? Scares the crap out of me.
On a lighter note, one friend had this to say about the coverage:
We’ve been watching BBC because we just can’t take the blather of the networks, cable and otherwise. At least BBC shuts up once in a while and just shows pictures with vaguely techno music. And Al-Jazeera with subtitles. (Universal Reaction: the war is bad) The announcers all look slightly disheveled in that British-bad-teeth sort of way and say great things like “I have no idea when that video was shot, or even if it’s live.”
Best line so far (from Ari “Uriah Heep” Fleischer): “[Iraq is evil because] they are a rich country, but they spend all their money on the military instead of feeding their people.” Hmmm.